
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Haaze.com / jminnisimj / All</title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com</link>
<description>Test Web 2.0 Content Management System</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple sues Nokia over iPhone scrolling patent]]></title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=apple-sues-nokia-over-iphone-scrolling-patent</link>
<comments>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=apple-sues-nokia-over-iphone-scrolling-patent</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jminnisimj</dc:creator>
<category>Mobile &amp; Electronics</category>
<guid>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=apple-sues-nokia-over-iphone-scrolling-patent</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The legal battle between Nokia and Apple shows no signs of letting up anytime soon.(Credit:Apple)Apple on Tuesday sued Nokia in the U.K. claiming that one of the company's patents is invalid, according to Bloomberg. The patent in question describes a scrolling technology on touch-screen handsets and is one of the patents Nokia previously sued Apple for violating.Nokia responded to the suit saying it is confident its patents are valid and it &quot;will take whatever actions are needed to protect our rights.&quot;Apple representatives were not immediately available for comment.The legal tangle between the two companies has been going on since 2009 when Nokia first sued Apple for violating 10 of its patents. Two months later, Apple filed a countersuit listing 10 patents it believed Nokia was violating.Bruce Sewell, Apple's general counsel, said at the time that &quot;companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours.&quot;The lawsuits and countersuits now span multiple countries including the U.S., U.K., Germany, and the Netherlands.<br/><br/>0 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google pays first top-end bounty for Chrome vulnerability]]></title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=google-pays-first-top-end-bounty-for-chrome-vulnerability</link>
<comments>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=google-pays-first-top-end-bounty-for-chrome-vulnerability</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jminnisimj</dc:creator>
<category>Mobile &amp; Electronics</category>
<guid>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=google-pays-first-top-end-bounty-for-chrome-vulnerability</guid>
<description><![CDATA[(Credit:Google)If there's a competition to uncover security holes in Google's browser, Sergey Glazunov is winning it.Yesterday Google awarded him $3,133.70 (&quot;eleet&quot;) for finding a critical vulnerability that Google patched with a new release of Chrome yesterday.It's the first time Google paid out this top bounty, but not the first time it's paid Glazunov. He's also been paid $1,337 four times for the &quot;leet&quot; level of vulnerabilities, eleven times for the $1,000-level, and once at the $500 level.The critical vulnerability relates to a &quot;stale pointer in speech handling,&quot; Google said, but hasn't published further details. Critical vulnerabilities let an attacker run arbitrary software on a person's computer just by visiting a Web site.Google issues Chrome updates automatically, so restarting the browser installs the new version.<br/><br/>0 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
