
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Haaze.com / jolynnpocj / All</title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com</link>
<description>Test Web 2.0 Content Management System</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung Droid Charge to see maintenance update]]></title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=samsung-droid-charge-to-see-maintenance-update</link>
<comments>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=samsung-droid-charge-to-see-maintenance-update</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jolynnpocj</dc:creator>
<category>Technology</category>
<guid>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=samsung-droid-charge-to-see-maintenance-update</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Droid Charge gets a small performance tweak in the EE4 update.(Credit:Verizon)The Samsung Droid Charge is set to pick up a minor software update in the near future that will be full of minor tweaks and bug fixes. At just under 10MB in size, the EE4 update centers on calling, e-mails, and messaging. For example, one adjustment makes it easier to place outgoing calls from the Visual Voice Mail application, while another allows for quicker dialing from the call log. Once it's installed, users may notice improved battery life, faster, more accurate GPS, and enhanced browser performance.Verizon hasn't officially discussed the update, but there is a support page online. According to the documents, Droid Charge owners will receive a notification that the update is available that will direct them to start the process. Given Verizon's track record with updates of this nature, I look for the company to make an announcement in short order.<br/><br/>0 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[China paper blusters at Google amid hacking affair]]></title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=china-paper-blusters-at-google-amid-hacking-affair</link>
<comments>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=china-paper-blusters-at-google-amid-hacking-affair</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jolynnpocj</dc:creator>
<category>Mobile &amp; Electronics</category>
<guid>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=china-paper-blusters-at-google-amid-hacking-affair</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The war of words between China and Google is heating up.China's top newspaper and mouthpiece for the country's Communist Party, the People's Daily, published a story today taking aim at the search giant, Reuters is reporting. And the statements indicate that there might be some political trouble ahead for Google.&quot;Google should not become overly embroiled in international political struggle, playing the role of a tool for political contention,&quot; the paper reads, according to Reuters. &quot;For when the international winds shift direction, it may become sacrificed to politics and will be spurned by the marketplace.&quot;The paper's comments are the latest critical comments made by the Chinese government, following Google's claims last week that the personal Gmail accounts of top U.S. government officials and Chinese political activists, among others, were targeted with phishing attacks aimed at gaining access to their accounts. Though Google stopped short of blaming the Chinese government for the attack, it said that they seemed to originate from Jinan, China, home to a Chinese government intelligence division.Google said that it &quot;detected and disrupted&quot; the attack before any trouble occurred, but the U.S. government said that it was investigating the incident to ensure information was not obtained. Speaking to CNET last week, a spokesperson for the National Security Council said that the attacks were limited to Gmail and the organization had &quot;no reason to believe that any official U.S. government e-mail accounts were accessed.&quot;Though the People's Daily offered up vague threats to Google, it stopped short of saying how the company might be serving as a &quot;tool&quot; in a political battle. The paper also took the opportunity to deny that the attacks were launched by members of the government, and called Google's comments on the matter &quot;spurious.&quot;There's no love lost between China and Google. Trouble has been brewing between them for quite some time, and the relationship became especially strained in early 2010 after the search giant discovered a &quot;highly sophisticated and targeted attack&quot; on its corporate infrastructure that resulted in the theft of some of its intellectual property. Google, which was one of many companies targeted, said that the attacks originated from China, but once again, the Chinese government denied any involvement.Google wasn't buying it, and the company threatened to remove its search service from China. After numerous shots were fired at either side, Google last year finally moved its China search to Hong Kong.Google isn't the only company to have issues in China. Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, among many others, are blocked within the country's borders.<br/><br/>0 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sprint to fight AT&T's bid for T-Mobile]]></title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=sprint-to-fight-atts-bid-for-t-mobile</link>
<comments>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=sprint-to-fight-atts-bid-for-t-mobile</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jolynnpocj</dc:creator>
<category>Technology</category>
<guid>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=sprint-to-fight-atts-bid-for-t-mobile</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When AT&amp;T announced its plans to acquire T-Mobile for $39 billion last week, Sprint was quick to criticize the deal, saying that it would dramatically alter the structure of the communications industry and affect innovation--a sentiment that was echoed by Sprint CEO Dan Hesse during CTIA 2011. In case its position wasn't clear, the carrier issued an official statement today to oppose the merger and announce its intentions to fight the deal. Vonya McCann, Sprint's senior vice president of government affairs, said:Sprint urges the United States government to block this anticompetitive acquisition. This transaction will harm consumers and harm competition at a time when this country can least afford it. As the first national carrier to roll out 4G services and handsets and the carrier that brought simple unlimited pricing to the marketplace, Sprint stands ready to compete in a truly dynamic marketplace. So on behalf of our customers, our industry, and our country, Sprint will fight this attempt by AT&amp;T to undo the progress of the past 25 years and create a new Ma Bell duopoly.Sprint added that the merger would undo nearly three decades of work by the U.S. government to modernize and open the U.S. communications markets to competition and affect job creation and investment in the American economy.Related linksT-Mobile acquisition may face regulatory hurdlesWhat does AT&amp;T's T-Mobile merger mean to you (FAQ)AT&amp;T: Buying T-Mobile speeds LTE shift in U.S.AT&amp;T and T-Mobile: Good for whomAT&amp;T doesn't quite see it that way, stating:The U.S. wireless market is intensely competitive with five or more competitors in 18 of the top 20 markets. The AT&amp;T T-Mobile merger will improve quality for consumers, provide a near-term solution to spectrum exhaust, and expand the availability of LTE to 95 percent of Americans, spurring innovation and economic growth.Sitting in third position among the U.S. wireless service providers, it's hard to ignore the fact that the merger could have a negative effect on Sprint as it tries to gain new subscribers and deal with the spectrum crisis. Despite recent efforts to provide a more open experience to customers with such offerings as integrating Google Voice into its cell phones, the AT&amp;T-T-Mobile megamerger would only make it more difficult for Sprint to compete against Verizon and AT&amp;T. However, in a telephone conversation with CNET, Sprint insisted that this wasn't about big companies yelling at each other, rather it's about the consumers and making sure they get competitive prices and a large selection of devices. Sprint said it would present its case during the public portion of the FCC hearing. The merger deal between AT&amp;T and T-Mobile would require the approval of the Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission, and the process is expected to take at least 12 months to complete. <br/><br/>0 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
