
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Haaze.com / svetalakn / All</title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com</link>
<description>Test Web 2.0 Content Management System</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 07:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rumor: New MacBook Pro case design coming]]></title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=rumor-new-macbook-pro-case-design-coming</link>
<comments>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=rumor-new-macbook-pro-case-design-coming</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 07:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>svetalakn</dc:creator>
<category>Technology</category>
<guid>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=rumor-new-macbook-pro-case-design-coming</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A new rumor pegs Apple as preparing a new MacBook Pro case design to replace the current unibody aluminum case. The new case design should be present on the next revision of the MacBook Pro, which just saw an update back in February. According to the sources of the rumor, the early 2011 MacBook Pro update is the last with the current case design.MacRumors claims that its source is reliably confirming the updated design, first leaked on iLounge just before February's MacBook Pro update. As noted by MacRumors, the unibody design currently used for MacBook Pro models was first introduced in late 2008, changing the classic MacBook Pro look that had been a holdover from early PowerBook models. No details of what the case design might look like have surfaced, but if the rumor holds, expect to see leaked photos and information shortly.It is likely that the new design would take cues from iPhones, iPads, and iPods, possibly adding touch-screen capabilities, showing off the soon-to-be-releasedMac OS X 7 Lion's touch-friendly desktop operating system features borrowed from iOS.What's on your short list for new MacBook Pro features Let me know in the comments!<br/><br/>0 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dolby finally delivers cheap 3D glasses that don&'t stink]]></title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=dolby-finally-delivers-cheap-3d-glasses-that-donrsquot-stink</link>
<comments>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=dolby-finally-delivers-cheap-3d-glasses-that-donrsquot-stink</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov -001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>svetalakn</dc:creator>
<category>Latest News</category>
<guid>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=dolby-finally-delivers-cheap-3d-glasses-that-donrsquot-stink</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Dolby  Laboratories is betting consumers are sick of using the shoddily  manufactured glasses distributed by theaters for 3D films, which look  and feel like a pair of sunglasses youa4a4d expect on a clearance rack at a  highway convenience store. But until now, the only alternative has been to  purchase a personal set compatible with that theatera4a4s projector.Dolbya4a4s  newly announced next generation 3D glasses feature 3Ma4a4s new multilayer  optical film lenses and are designed to be more form fitting to a  persona4a4s face. They are scratch resistant, have anti-glare coating and  most importantly, have been produced specifically with the cinema  exhibitor in mind &amp;8212' meaning they want theaters to use these as the  standard.The  reason theaters are still using crappy 3D glasses has to do  entirely with cost. The lenses needed for Dolby Digital 3D projectors  are expensive, as would be the cost of tracking  high-end glasses. Therefore, material costs are kept low to  allow for theaters to wash and reuse whatever survives after a film has  been viewed by the audience.Dolbya4a4s  new 3D glasses have a list price of $12, which Ia4a4m assuming is  comparable to the costs of whata4a4s currently being used by theaters. The  glasses can be washed for reuse and also contain individually serialized  RFID tags for tracking and management purposes.The  end result will hopefully be that theaters switch over to these new  ergonomically and aesthetically pleasing 3D glasses, since they improve  the quality of service without breaking the bank. The best case  scenario for consumers is that ticket prices will stay the same, but  judging from previous actions by theaters thata4a4s highly unlikely.Dolby  has several motivations for putting this much effort into upgrading 3D  glasses for theaters. The biggest reason is likely the growing level of consumer negativity towards 3D films and their desire to keep demand high for 3D projectors. However, Dolby  doesna4a4t make any money off of cheap 3D glasses that are sold to  theaters. If theirs were to become the new standard, that would  certainly change.Next Story: Would you pay $845K for this hybrid Porsche Previous Story: Andreessen-Horowitz brings enterprise pro Peter Levine on boardPrintEmailTwitterFacebookGoogle BuzzLinkedIn      DiggStumbleUponRedditDeliciousGoogleMore&amp;8230'          Tags: 3D, 3D Glasses, filmCompanies: Dolby, Dolby Laboratories          Tags: 3D, 3D Glasses, filmCompanies: Dolby, Dolby LaboratoriesTom Cheredar is a contributing reporter at VentureBeat and freelance journalist. He graduated from Middle Tennessee State University with a degree in Journalism. In addition to covering technology, his work can be found at geeksofdoom.com. You can reach him on Twitter at @tched. Have news to share Launching a startup Email: tips@venturebeat.comVentureBeat has new weekly email newsletters.  Stay on top of the news, and don't miss a beat.<br/><br/>0 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
