
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Haaze.com / aldaccccad / Published News</title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com</link>
<description>Test Web 2.0 Content Management System</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 07:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Vivendi to buy Vodafone's stake in SFR]]></title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=vivendi-to-buy-vodafones-stake-in-sfr</link>
<comments>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=vivendi-to-buy-vodafones-stake-in-sfr</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 07:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>aldaccccad</dc:creator>
<category>Technology</category>
<guid>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=vivendi-to-buy-vodafones-stake-in-sfr</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Vivendi announced today that it has agreed to acquire Vodafone's 44 percent stake in French mobile operator SFR for 7.95 billion euros ($11.3 billion).The deal would give Vivendi, which already owned 56 percent of SFR shares, complete control of SFR--France's second largest carrier, with nearly 21 million customers. &quot;We are very pleased to reach our strategic objective to own 100 percent of SFR, which will help Vivendi to focus further on profitable growth and innovation,&quot; Vivendi CEO Jean-Bernard Levy said in a statement. &quot;I am very confident that this will greatly benefit both the Group's industrial development and our millions of subscribers and consumers globally. The transaction will create a significant increase in Vivendi's adjusted net income, enabling us to raise the dividend to our shareholders.&quot; Under the terms of the cash deal, Vodafone will receive 7.75 billion euros ($11 billion) and an addition 200 million euros ($284 million) in the form of SFR's final dividend.&quot;Our board remains committed to realising maximum value from our noncontrolled assets,&quot; Vodafone CEO Vittorio Colao said in a statement. &quot;The sale of our stake in SFR, at an attractive multiple, represents a significant further step in the execution of this strategy.&quot;Vodafone and SFR also announced that they would maintain a commercial partnership.Vivendi said the deal is expected to close by the end of June, but is subject to customary Competition Authority approval.<br/><br/>0 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple hints it wants to tax content, not software]]></title>
<link>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=apple-hints-it-wants-to-tax-content-not-software</link>
<comments>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=apple-hints-it-wants-to-tax-content-not-software</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov -001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>aldaccccad</dc:creator>
<category>Latest News</category>
<guid>http://www.haaze.com/story.php?title=apple-hints-it-wants-to-tax-content-not-software</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Apple recently dropped another hammer on iPhone app developers by requiring them to use a subscription payment plan similar to Apple&amp;'s in-app purchasing plan.But Apple&amp;'s chief executive Steve Jobs said that web-based software applications that do not involve publishing contentdo not fall under Apple&amp;'s new subscription plans in an email message today, according to MacRumors. That means that services like Dropbox, Box.net and other analytics suites would not have to work under Apple&amp;'s new laws a4&quot; at least, that&amp;'s the theory.&amp;''We created subscriptions for publishing apps, not SaaS apps,&amp;'' Jobs said in the message.SaaS, or software-as-a-service, refers to any application that is run on a remote server and accessed through a web-based interface. That includes services like online radio Pandora, Facebook and other storage applications. But there are plenty of arguments that content-producing applications like the Wall Street Journal are also &amp;''SaaS&amp;'' applications. In fact, most applications outside of games on the Apple app store are run on remote servers and transmit their data through the web to iPhones and iPads everywhere a4&quot; meaning they fall under the category of &amp;''SaaS&amp;'' applications in the broad sense.So far it seems like the largest complaint is that Apple is not clear about which applications are going to fall under its subscription plan, which lets iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch users subscribe to a service by pressing a single button and sends 30 percent of the subscription revenue to Apple. While it looks like Jobs draws a clear line between service applications and content applications, there&amp;'s still a lot of confusion on the rest of the web.The team behind Readability, a mobile web reader that strips away advertising and other images from websites, recently abandoned their plans to work on Apple devices because of Apple&amp;'s new subscription rules. That was a clear-cut case of an app serving as a content publisher rather than a service application. But it isn&amp;'t clear where to certain companies that consider themselves media companies, like LinkedIn, fall on Apple&amp;'s eye test.Apple&amp;'s execution when it announced the newest subscription plan was also terrible, said Aaron Levie, chief executive of Box.net. His company, which provides enterprise storage on and collaboration tools on remote servers, has an application on the app store a4&quot; but it doesn&amp;'t look like it will fall under the subscription plan, as per Jobs&amp;' latest comments.&amp;''If I were in Applea4a4s place, and bear in mind wea4a4re drinking the same water in Palo Alto, this should have been rolled out as something a4Acoola4 and exclusive rather than enforced,&amp;'' Levie said. &amp;''And you would have seen a lot more support because of it.&amp;''He said Box.net would still continue working with the app store regardless, because they have &amp;''bigger fish to fry.&amp;'' It looks like other enterprise-class applications like Salesforce will be spared Apple&amp;'s 30 percent revenue share. It&amp;'s probably for the best, too a4&quot; Apple is quietly making significant strides in the enterprise space, and a jab at their enterprise app developers could do a lot of damage to a budding segment that has a lot of room to grow.VentureBeat has contacted Apple to get some additional clarification about what applications fall under its new subscription plan and where Software-as-a-service applications like Box.net stand. We&amp;'ll update the story as soon as we hear back.[Photo: acaben]Previous Story: Scvngr finds 1 million users willing to complete location challengesPrintEmailTwitterFacebookGoogle BuzzLinkedIn      DiggStumbleUponRedditDeliciousGoogleMore&amp;8230'          Tags: cloud, enterprise, iOS, iPad, iPhone, iPhone operating system, saas, software as a serviceCompanies: Apple, Box.net, Google, linkedin, Readability          Tags: cloud, enterprise, iOS, iPad, iPhone, iPhone operating system, saas, software as a serviceCompanies: Apple, Box.net, Google, linkedin, ReadabilityMatthew Lynley is VentureBeat's enterprise writer. He graduated from the University of North Carolina, where he studied math and physics, in May 2010. He has reported for Reuters. He currently lives in San Francisco, California. You can reach him at mattl@venturebeat.com (all story pitches should also be sent to tips@venturebeat.com), and on Twitter at @logicalmoron. Have news to share Launching a startup Email: tips@venturebeat.comVentureBeat has new weekly email newsletters.  Stay on top of the news, and don't miss a beat.<br/><br/>0 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
